Squeeze-out procedure

What is a squeeze-out procedure?

A squeeze-out procedure is a legal mechanism that allows a majority shareholder, or a group of qualifying majority shareholders, to compulsorily acquire shares held by minority shareholders. Its purpose is to enable full control over a company where the majority already holds a very high level of ownership, while ensuring that minority shareholders receive payment for their shares under rules set by law.

In Polish corporate law, the squeeze-out mechanism is most commonly associated with joint-stock companies and public companies. The applicable rules depend on the legal form of the company and whether it is a public company, including whether its shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market or introduced to an alternative trading system. For non-public joint-stock companies, the key regulation is Article 418 of the Polish Commercial Companies Code. For public companies, the relevant framework is contained in the Act of 29 July 2005 on Public Offering, Conditions Governing the Introduction of Financial Instruments to Organised Trading, and Public Companies, in particular the provisions on compulsory acquisition and compulsory sale of shares.

A squeeze-out is not a general right to remove minority shareholders at any time. It is a formal corporate procedure that must meet statutory thresholds, voting requirements, valuation rules and procedural safeguards. These requirements are important because the procedure interferes with shareholder rights, including ownership of shares and participation in corporate governance.

How does the squeeze-out procedure work?

In a non-public Polish joint-stock company, Article 418 § 1 of the Commercial Companies Code provides that the general meeting may adopt a resolution on the compulsory buyout of shares held by shareholders representing not more than 5% of the share capital. The buyout may be carried out by not more than five shareholders who jointly hold at least 95% of the share capital, provided that each of them holds at least 5% of the share capital. The resolution generally requires a majority of 95% of votes cast, unless the articles of association provide for stricter conditions. These thresholds and voting requirements come directly from Article 418 § 1 of the Commercial Companies Code.

The resolution should identify the shareholders whose shares are to be bought out and the shareholders who will acquire them. The buyout price is not freely determined by the majority. In principle, it is established by an expert auditor appointed by the general meeting, and if such appointment is not made, by an expert appointed by the registration court. This valuation element is intended to protect minority shareholders from an arbitrary or understated buyout price.

In public companies, the compulsory acquisition of shares is regulated separately. The Public Offering Act provides a mechanism under which a shareholder, acting alone or together with entities specified by the Act, holding the statutory level of voting rights may demand that the remaining shareholders sell their shares. The current statutory threshold for such mechanisms is linked to holding 95% of the total number of votes in the public company, as provided in the Public Offering Act. Price determination in public company squeeze-out cases is connected with statutory pricing rules applicable to transactions in shares of public companies, including rules designed to reflect market value and prior transaction prices.

When is a squeeze-out procedure used?

A squeeze-out is typically used after a takeover, merger, restructuring or acquisition process, when the majority shareholder wants to obtain full ownership or near-complete control of the company. It may also be used where a fragmented minority shareholding makes corporate decision-making more complex, increases administrative costs or creates practical obstacles to restructuring.

For majority shareholders, the procedure may simplify corporate governance, eliminate the need to manage minority shareholder relations and facilitate strategic decisions such as delisting, group restructuring, sale of assets, refinancing or integration with another entity. For minority shareholders, the procedure results in a forced exit from the company, but it should also provide a structured route to receive consideration for shares under statutory rules.

The procedure may be relevant in both domestic and cross-border transactions. In acquisition practice, investors often analyse whether a squeeze-out is available before launching a transaction, especially where full control is commercially important. In public M&A, the ability to reach the statutory threshold may influence the structure of the offer, financing and post-closing integration plan.

What are the main legal risks?

The main risks concern failure to meet statutory thresholds, defects in the shareholders’ meeting resolution, incorrect identification of shareholders, valuation disputes and breach of procedural requirements. Minority shareholders may challenge corporate resolutions or raise objections to the valuation if they believe the procedure was conducted improperly or the price does not reflect the value of the shares.

In public companies, additional risks arise from capital market regulations, disclosure obligations, rules on acting in concert, transaction pricing and the involvement of investment firms or supervisory authorities. A squeeze-out in a listed company should therefore be coordinated with securities law compliance, corporate approvals and transaction documentation.

Because the procedure affects ownership rights, courts and authorities may closely examine whether the statutory conditions were satisfied. A quick legal assessment before adopting a resolution or announcing a transaction may help avoid invalid corporate actions, disputes with shareholders, delays, liability of corporate bodies or financial losses resulting from an incorrectly structured buyout.

When should legal advice be obtained?

Legal support is advisable before any decision to initiate a squeeze-out, particularly where the shareholding structure is complex, shares are disputed, the company has different classes of shares, or the transaction follows a takeover or restructuring. Minority shareholders should also seek advice if they receive notice of a compulsory buyout and have doubts about the legality of the procedure or the proposed valuation.

For companies and majority shareholders, legal analysis should cover the applicable legal basis, shareholding thresholds, voting requirements, meeting documentation, valuation process, payment mechanics and potential challenges. For public companies, the analysis should also include market abuse rules, disclosure duties and requirements under the Public Offering Act.

Legal support in squeeze-out matters may include:

assessment of whether statutory squeeze-out thresholds are met,
preparation of corporate resolutions, notices and meeting documentation,
coordination of share valuation and cooperation with expert auditors,
support in public company squeeze-out and sell-out procedures,
advice on shareholder rights and potential challenges to resolutions,
transaction structuring after acquisitions, mergers or group reorganisations,
representation in disputes relating to compulsory buyout of shares.

Need assistance with a squeeze-out procedure? Contact us.